Motu 828 mk3 vs mk2 drivers#
Motu 828 mk3 vs mk2 manual#
Motu 828 mk3 vs mk2 upgrade#

I found the converters and pres on it to be on par with the Digi 002 Rack, but definitely inferior to the Fireface (although clocking the Octane to the Fireface makes up for a lot of that.) Oh- since the Octane was mentioned I figured I should pipe in on that, too. I found it a big sonic improvement from the Digi 002 Rack that I had previously. It does a lot of things and does them very well.

Motu 828 mk3 vs mk2 manual#

I just finally read through the manual and now realize just how flexible and powerful it is. That said, you won't feel sorry spending a little more for the Fireface. The only edge the MOTU might have (if I read correctly when I skimmed the specs a few weeks ago) was that mk3 version of the MOTU has some onboard DSP so you can run FX (EQ, compressors, I think) in Cuemix, which is totally cool. They sound amazing and are very flexible indeed. I have a Fireface 800 as well (2 of them, actually) and would have to say I definitely love them. We used my studio to do the vocal and guitar overdubs and I was able to just rack up his nice Focusrite ISA Prepack and hook it up via the adat lightpipe input and viola, had these great pres running into my FF800 with no hassles. The recording engineer flew in from the UK and brought with him a few choice preamps. Was recently working on a live recording project with a well known artist.

Motu 828 mk3 vs mk2 upgrade#

I love the fact that I do not have to upgrade my interface if I want to use higher end converters. The 4 pres on this unit are very quiet and clean.Īs you can tell I still really love my FF800 even after 2 years of use.

I have never had to use support myself but I have seen how fast support related posts on the RME forum get replies from the devs. They have their own forum where the developers are frequently found in the conversations.

Motu 828 mk3 vs mk2 drivers#

RME is also quick to develop new drivers and often adds new features to the product or eaks out a bit more performance, though whether you used the older drivers or newer ones, the product is still extremely stable. RME are known for their rock solid drivers and they have been totally stable for me. You can route any input to any output all using the total mix software to control the mixing facilities of the hardware.

The FF800 is also a full on mixer in addition to being an interface. As stated above, the FF800 is so much more than a 10 input firewire device. The RME FF800 was definitely the more costly of the units I was looking at, but the benefits put it in a whole other league for me.Įxpandability. I was in your same situation 2 years ago. That would give me up to 84 simultaneous ins and outs if I ever saw the need. If that were not enought I could purchase up to 2 more fireface units and daisy chain them they will show up as one asio unit in the host. If I ever saw the need I could add another adat lightpipe converter and have a total of 28 simultaneous inputs and outputs. I now have a total of 20 analog inputs all through the fireface800. Recently picked up a Maudio Octane which I hooked up to the adat 1 input. I also like the fact that it is expandable with 2 adat lightpipe ins and outs.